Pervy McBeer
12:59 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Wonder what would happen if we got bought out by some rich Russian oligarch within the Putin regime? Nerve agent laced half time oranges for the opposition? Like Lasagne-gate but on a deadlier scale. We'd probably still find a way to sod it up and lose the match. Harry Kane's lifeless body is still capable of beating Joe Hart.
|
JAC
12:58 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
"communicating with mobile phones, and creating small-scale problems."
Really????...I can never get phone reception at our state of the art stadium.Goodn luck with that.
|
Lily Hammer
12:52 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Why would 100 of us make an oganised concerted effort to get just 4 fans on the pitch?
If we’d made such an effort, there have been 400? 4,000? fans on the pitch.
Stick to dildos and crotchless knickers Daves and leave this kind of shit to Putin.
|
terry-h
12:51 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Anyone know who exactly is on the board apart from the DESPICABLE THREE?
|
goose
12:48 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
their idiocy knows no bounds.
as long as they keep doing this, the depth of feeling towards them will get worse.
if there is a repeat of problems at the Soton game then they only have themselves to blame.
stay away and keep quiet = no problems.
|
percyd
12:44 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
"It has been established that on Saturday, 85% of those attempts were repelled."
So, if 85% were "repelled" and - what was it - 3 or 4 made it onto the pitch then this cellular conspiracy amounted to around 20-25 individuals who actually attempted to get onto the pitch. Hardly an invasion is it?
|
chedylan 2
12:03 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
The cunts will never get it.
They were desperate to suppress the march, and got their way my hoodwinking RWF.
Didn't work tho did it cunts. Fans frustrations boiled over in front of your faces instead.
Like the Soviets the dwarf wierdo dresses as. He hasn't anything from how that ended up.
|
Johnson
1:33 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
The SAB has it apparently, comma said so.
|
El Scorchio
1:25 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
I can’t believe that story to be anything other than total bullshit unless I see some pretty strong evidence to the contrary.
|
Johnson
1:07 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Right, so I read the link.
Seems the only reference to organised pitch invasion is via the analysis tapped on the end by a journo presumably keen for a feel of Brady’s tits.
So I ask again, where did the SAB say this was organised pitch invasions?
|
,
12:59 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43424575
|
Johnson
12:57 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Feasting?
Reading. Cunt phone.
|
Johnson
12:57 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Where does it say it came from the SAG, comma?
I’m not arsed feasting the link
|
Takashi Miike
12:56 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
whetstone was on TS last night , and yes he is rather wet
|
,
12:56 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Just to be specific this "news" came from the Safety Advisory Group" [ SAG ].
SAG comprises representatives from the club, police, Newham council, and stadium owners and operators.
So how can all these groups other than the club go along with this contention of supporters using their mobiles inside the stadium?
|
WHUDeano
12:53 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Would love to see proof of how the pitch invaders texted each other before entering the field of play. The fact that this is in the BBC and not one of the standard tabloids is quite unbelievable.
|
Mike Oxsaw
12:45 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
VirginiaHam 12:39 Fri Mar 16
It looks like as it is still an "issue" as it seems the police stay outside the stadium until/unless called in (because they're out of contact with their bosses when inside).
THAT's how concerned the club are about security & safety.
|
VirginiaHam
12:39 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Mike Oxsaw 12:33 Fri Mar 16
I remember that Police issue. I used Vodaphone when I was at he shithole but can't remember if it worked or not.
|
Willtell
12:34 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Sullivan making up stories and drip feeding them to the media......nah impossible!!
|
Mike Oxsaw
12:33 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
VirginiaHam 12:22 Fri Mar 16
The construction of the stadium makes it a radio blind spot for mobiles (including the police TETRA system).
They had to install a special system to allow radio communications inside the bowl while the Olympics were on and there was quite a few posts (on here, even) about what would happen once it was removed (not replaced, obviously).
You can't spin the laws of physics (they have their own).
Bluetooth could have been used inside the stadium, but that requires a lot of prior configuration and fiddling with accepting connections afterwards.
"Beard" is the correct call here.
|
BRANDED
12:25 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
|
Spasticated
|
| 
